The HER family of receptor tyrosine kinases (EGFR/HER1, ErbB2/HER2, ErbB3/HER3, ErbB4/HER4) plays a major role in the pathogenesis of many solid tumors. In approximately 25% to 30% of breast cancers, overexpression of HER2 has been linked to shorter disease-free and overall survival, lack of responsiveness to tamoxifen antiestrogen therapy, and altered responsiveness to a variety of cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens.

Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed at the extracellular domain of HER2, has offered significant shorter disease-free and overall survival advantages in the metastatic and adjuvant settings in HER2-overexpressing patients, although not all patients respond. Fewer than 50% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer show initial benefit from trastuzumab treatment, and many of those eventually develop resistance.^1,2,3,

Current methodologies for the selection of HER2-positive patients include immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect HER2 protein overexpression and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification. However, controversy still exists regarding the accuracy, reliability, and interobserver variability of these assay methods. IHC provides a semiquantitative measure of protein levels (scored as 0, 1+, 2+, 3+) and the interpretation may be subjective. FISH is a quantitative measurement of gene amplification, in which the HER2 gene copy number is counted. However, FISH, which is considered to be more quantitative analytically, is not always representative of protein expression, and multiple studies have failed to demonstrate a relation between HER2 gene copy number and response to trastuzumab. Whereas patients who overexpress HER2 protein (IHC) or show evidence of HER2 gene amplification (FISH) have been shown to experience better outcomes on trastuzumab than those scored negative by those assays, differences in the degree of expression or amplification by these methods have generally not been shown to discriminate between groups with different outcomes. IHC and FISH testing may be affected by interlaboratory variability, and neither test provides quantitative data that reflect the activation state of signaling pathways in tumors, which may limit their utility in patient selection.^4, Most laboratories in North America and Europe use IHC to determine HER2 protein status, with equivocal category results (2+) confirmed by FISH (or more recently by chromogenic in situ hybridization).

Typically, HER2 activates signaling pathways by dimerizing with ligand-bound epidermal growth factor receptor family members such as HER1 and HER3. A HER2 ligand has not been identified, but overexpressed HER2 is constitutively active. When HER2 is pathologically overexpressed, the receptor may homodimerize and activate signaling cascades in the absence of the normal regulatory control imposed by the requirement for ligand binding of its heterodimerization partners.

A novel assay (HERmark® Breast Cancer Assay) was developed to quantify total HER2 protein expression and HER2 homodimers in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. On the HERmark® website, the manufacturer describes the test as "a novel HER-2 testing alternative to identify candidates for HER2-targeted therapy," and does not clearly target use for any particular breast cancer subpopulations (e.g., those with equivocal and/or discordant IHC/FISH tests).^5,

Regulatory Status

Clinical laboratories may develop and validate tests in-house and market them as a laboratory service; laboratory-developed tests must meet the general regulatory standards of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. HERmark® Breast Cancer Assay (Monogram Biosciences) is available under the auspices of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. Laboratories that offer laboratory-developed tests must be licensed by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments for high-complexity testing. To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has chosen not to require any regulatory review of this test.

Related Policies

• Trastuzumab (Herceptin), Trastuzumab-dkst (Ogivri), Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla), Trastuzumab-pkrb (Herzuma), Trastuzumab-dttb (Ontruzant), and Trastuzumab and Hyaluronidase-oysk (Herceptin Hylecta) (Policy #011 in the Drugs Section)

Genetic Counseling
Experts recommend formal genetic counseling for patients who are at risk for inherited disorders and who wish to undergo genetic testing. Interpreting the results of genetic tests and understanding risk factors can be difficult for some patients; genetic counseling helps individuals understand the impact of genetic testing, including the possible effects the test results could have on the individual or their family members. It should be noted that genetic counseling may alter the utilization of genetic testing substantially and may reduce inappropriate testing; further, genetic counseling should be performed by an individual with experience and expertise in genetic medicine and genetic testing methods.


[RATIONALE: This policy was created in 2011 and has been updated regularly with searches of the MEDLINE database. The most recent literature update was performed through October 27, 2019.

Evidence reviews assess whether a medical test is clinically useful. A useful test provides information to make a clinical management decision that improves the net health outcome. That is, the balance of benefits and harms is better when the test is used to manage the condition than when another test or no test is used to manage the condition.

The first step in assessing a medical test is to formulate the clinical context and purpose of the test. The test must be technically reliable, clinically valid, and clinically useful for that purpose.

Quantitative Assay for Measurement of HER2 Total Protein Expression and HER2 Dimers
Clinical Context and Test Purpose

The purpose of assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status using quantitative total HER2 protein expression and HER2 homodimer measurement in patients who have breast cancer is to inform a decision whether to modify treatment strategies to include HER2-targeted therapy or not.

The question addressed in this policy is: Does an assessment of HER2 status using quantitative total HER2 protein expression and HER2 homodimer measurement in patients who have breast cancer result in an improved health outcome compared with the assessment of HER2 status using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)?

The following PICOTS were used to select literature to inform this policy.

Patients

The relevant population of interest are individuals with breast cancer who are undergoing an assessment of HER2 status.

Interventions

The relevant intervention is the assessment of HER2 status using quantitative total HER2 protein expression and HER2 homodimer measurement.

Comparators

The relevant comparators of interest currently used to make decisions about the assessment of HER2 status are: IHC and ISH.

Outcomes

The general outcomes of interest are overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, test accuracy, and test validity.

The potential beneficial outcomes of primary interest would be improvements in OS and disease-specific survival.

Potential harmful outcomes are those resulting from a false-positive or false-negative test results. False-positive test results can lead to inappropriate clinical management with HER2-targeted therapy. False-negative test results can lead to absence or delayed HER2-targeted therapy.

Timing

The time frame for outcome measures varies from immediately following testing diagnosis to long-term health outcomes subsequent to management changes.

Setting

Patients requiring treatment for breast cancer are managed by an oncologist and are likely to be tested in an outpatient setting. Referral for genetic counseling is important for the explanation of the genetic disease, heritability, genetic risk, test performance, and possible outcomes.

Study Selection Criteria

Below are selection criteria for studies to assess whether a test is clinically valid.

1. The study population represents the population of interest. Eligibility and selection are described.
2. The test is compared with a credible reference standard.
3. If the test is intended to replace or be an adjunct to an existing test; it should also be compared with that test.
4. Studies should report sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Studies that completely report true- and false-positive results are ideal. Studies reporting other measures (e.g., receiver operating characteristic , area under receiver operating characteristic, c-statistic, likelihood ratios) may be included but are less informative.
5. Studies should also report reclassification of the diagnostic or risk category.

Assessment of technical reliability focuses on specific tests and operators and requires a review of unpublished and often proprietary information. Review of specific tests, operators, and unpublished data are outside the scope of this policy and alternative sources exist. This policy focuses on the clinical validity and clinical utility.

Clinically Valid

Retrospective studies, discussed below, have reported on the association between H2T levels and survival outcomes (see Tables 1).

Table 1. Summary of Studies of HERmark Clinical Validity

Reference	Cutoffs Used		Result	Favored Group
	Low	High		Low	Int	High
Lipton et al (2010)6,	<13.8	>68.5	Better response to trastuzumab at higher levels of HER2 total expression observed			X
Toi et al (2010)7,	b	≥median H2Tb	Patients with higher H2T values (>75% percentile) lived longer than those with lower H2T values in the high HER2-expressing group Patients with lower H2T values lived longer than those with higher H2T values in the low HER2-expressing group	X		X
Bates et al (2011)8,	<13.8	>68.5	Group with intermediate H2T levels experienced longest TTP and OS		X
Joensuu et al (2011)9,	NA	≥125.4a	Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with very high tumor HER2 content may benefit less from adjuvant trastuzumab than those whose cancer has more moderate HER2 content	X	X
Duchnowska et al (2012)10,	<58c	≥58c	Correlation between continuous H2T level and TTBM confirmed on multivariate analysis	X	X
Han et al (2012)11,	<13.8	≥13.8	TTP longer in patients with high H2T than in patients with low H2T		X	X
Lipton et al (2013)12,	<16.1	>68.3	Low H2T and high H2T correlated with shorter PFS and OS		X
Barros et al (2014)13,	Per specific heterodimer	studied	Low heterodimer levels favored among unselected patients; no association among trastuzumab-treated or -naive HER2-positive patients	X
Montemurro et al (2014)14,	≥median H2T		Increasing log (H2T) was associated with a longer persistence on protocol		X	X
Yardley et al (2015)15,	<13.8	≥13.8	High H2T associated with significantly shorter OS vs low H2T	X
Scaltriti et al (2015)16,	≥median H2T		Increasing H2T associated with improved pathologic complete response		X	X
Duchnowska et al (2017)17,	< 13.8	≥median H2T	Patients with moderately overexpressed HER2 levels and high p95HER2 expression may have best outcomes while receiving lapatinib following progression on trastuzumab	X		X
Chumsri et al (2018)18,	<10.5	>17.8	High H2T levels correlated with longer progression-free survival			X

HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; H2T: HER2 protein; Int: intermediate; NA: not applicable; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; TTBM: time to brain metastasis; TTP: time to progression.

^a Cutoff for very high H2T (≥22-fold the median H2T of cancers HER2-negative by chromogenic in situ hybridization [5.7])
^b Absolute values not reported.
^c Median H2T level. H2T value of 50 was a better discriminator (smaller p-value in Cox models).

Joensuu et al (2011) reported results of measurement of H2T using HERmark from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue of 899 (89%) women who participated in the Finland Herceptin trial (ISRCTN76560285) to determine if very high tumor H2T content influences outcome in early breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy.^9, HER2 status was determined prior to entry to the study by IHC; chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) was used to confirm HER2 status for cases with IHC +2 or +3. Using the CISH test, 197 (21.9%) patients had HER2-positive cancer and were randomized to trastuzumab or control. Tumor H2T levels varied greatly, by 1808-fold. High H2T levels strongly correlated with a positive HER2 status by CISH (p<0.001). Cut points for defining levels of H2T were not prespecified. Patients with very high H2T (defined by ≥22-fold the median of HER2-negative cancers [5.7; range, 0.4-118.4]; 13% of CISH-positive cancers) did not benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab (HR for distant recurrence, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.33 to 4.62; p=0.75), whereas the remaining patients with HER2-positive disease by CISH (87%) did benefit (HR for distant recurrence, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 1.00; p=0.050). The authors concluded that patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with very high tumor HER2 content may benefit less from adjuvant trastuzumab than those whose cancer has more moderate HER2 content. Subgroup analysis of patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Toi et al (2010) investigated the relation between H2T or H2D and OS in 72 patients drawn from 6 oncology clinics in Japan who had metastatic breast cancer and had been treated with at least 1 chemotherapy regimen before receiving trastuzumab.^7, Patients were originally selected for treatment with trastuzumab using IHC (88%) or FISH (12%). HERmark assay results were correlated with OS using univariate Kaplan-Meier, hazard function plots, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Clinical outcome data were drawn from the medical chart review. Measurements of H2T and H2D were tested for association with OS, defined as the time from the start of trastuzumab treatment to cancer-associated death or end of follow-up (median, 18.2 months). The median duration of trastuzumab treatment was 14.6 months. The 2-year OS rate was 60.8% (95% CI, 48.4% to 73.2%). Cut points for defining levels of H2T were not prespecified. In univariate analyses, patients were classified into 4 subgroups defined by the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for each of the 3 variables, H2T, H2D, and their ratio, H2D/H2T. Hazard function plots were estimated in the 4 H2T subgroups, and subgroups with the 25% highest and lowest H2T values had a substantially lower risk of death than the middle 2 subgroups. Dividing the cohort into high HER2-expressing (greater than or equal to the median value of H2T) and low HER2-expressing (less than the median value of H2T) subgroups and using Cox regression with the continuous H2T value in each of subgroup, patients with higher HER2 values had longer survival than those with lower H2T values in the high HER2-expressing group (HR=0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.51; p=0.010). In contrast, in the low HER2-expressing group, the opposite trend (those with lower H2T values were favored) was observed (HR=16.0; 95% CI, 1.64 to 155.9; p=0.017). The authors concluded that there were two subpopulations in this cohort that behaved differently with respect to HER2 expression and OS and that the quantitative amount of HER2 expression measured by HERmark may be a useful new marker to identify a more relevant target population for trastuzumab treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Statistical analysis of patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Lipton et al (2010) used the HERmark assay in patients with HER2 overexpressing and/or amplified metastatic breast cancer who were treated with trastuzumab.^6, Of 102 patients, FISH testing was repeated in 99 patients. Per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, further tests are not recommended in patients with IHC +1 or +3 scores; all patients found to be FISH negative on retesting were previously scored as IHC +3 Cut points for defining levels of H2T were not prespecified. Sixty-six (87%) of 76 central FISH-positive patients had high H2T levels (concordant positive), and 19 (86%) of 22 central FISH-negative patients were H2T low (concordant negative). Three (14%) of 22 central FISH-negative patients were H2T high (discordant H2T high), and 10 (13%) of 76 central FISH-positive patients were H2T low (ISH/H2T discordant H2T low). The concordant positive group had a significantly longer TTP (median, 11.3 months) compared with the concordant negative group (median, 4.5 months; HR=0.42; p<0.001), and also compared with the discordant H2T low group (median, 3.7 months; HR=0.43; p=0.01). The discordant H2T low group behaved similarly compared with concordant negatives (HR=1; p=0.99). In analyses restricted to central FISH-positive patients only (n=77), Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression identified H2T as an independent predictor of TTP (HR=0.29; p<0.001) and OS (HR=0.19, p<0.001). The authors concluded that a subset of patients with HER2 gene amplification by FISH express low levels of HER2 protein and have reduced response to trastuzumab-containing therapy, similar to FISH-negative.

Han et al (2012) performed a retrospective analysis in 52 women with HER2 overexpressing and/or amplified locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after treatment with an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab.^11, Patients were treated with lapatinib and capecitabine until disease progression or intolerance. Cut points for defining levels of H2T were not prespecified. Among all patients, median TTP was longer in patients with high H2T (>13.8; 5.0 months) than in patients with low H2T (<13.8; 1.8 months; p=0.047). However, a cutoff of 14.95 had greater discrimination (lower chi-square p-value). Results were similar using this cutoff; median TTP in patients with high H2T (>14.95) was 5.2 months and in those with low H2T (<14.95), 1.8 months (p=0.018). No significant association was found between H2T levels and OS using either cut point. Among subgroups defined by H3T levels, median TTP was significantly longer (5.6 months) in patients with both high H2T (>14.95) and high H3T (>0.605) than in other groups (2.2 months; p=0.002). Subgroup analysis of patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Duchnowska et al (2012) investigated the correlation between H2T in primary breast cancers and time-to-brain metastasis (TTBM) in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.^10, The patient sample included 142 consecutive patients who were administered trastuzumab-based therapy. HER2 status was initially determined by IHC; subsequently, the HER2/neu gene copy number was quantified as the HER2/CEP17 ratio by central laboratory FISH. HER2 protein was quantified as H2T by the HERmark assay in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. HER2 variables were correlated with clinical features, and TTBM was measured from the initiation of trastuzumab-containing therapy. A higher H2T level (continuous variable) correlated with shorter TTBM, whereas HER2 amplification by FISH and a continuous HER2/CEP17 ratio were not predictive (p=0.013, 0.28, and 0.25, respectively). In the subset of patients that were centrally determined by FISH to be HER2-positive, an above-the-median H2T level (>58) was significantly associated with a shorter TTBM (HR=2.4, p=0.005), whereas this was not true for the median HER2/CEP17 ratio by FISH (p=0.4). The correlation between a continuous H2T level and TTBM was confirmed on multivariate analysis (HR=3.3, p=0.024). The authors concluded that their data revealed a strong relationship between quantitative HER2 protein expression level and risk for brain relapse in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients and that quantitative assessment of HER2 protein expression may inform and facilitate refinements in therapeutic treatment strategies for selected subpopulations of patients in this group. Subgroup analysis in patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Barros et al (2014) used proximity ligation assays to characterize specific HER2 heterodimers and their association with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free interval.^13, Tumor samples were from patients who had primary operable, invasive breast cancer at a single-center in England. Among 1858 unselected patients, high levels of all 3 HER2 heterodimers (HER2/HER1 [EGFR], HER2/HER3, HER2/HER4) showed statistically worse BCSS and disease-free interval compared with low levels (range of HRs for BCSS, 0.62-0.66 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.92]; p≤0.014; range of HRs for disease-free interval, 0.64-0.72 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.98]; p≤0.037). Cut points were determined using X-tile, a graphical method that has been used in breast cancer research.^19, However, among the subgroup of 224 patients who were HER2-positive by IHC and FISH, associations between HER2 heterodimers and patient outcomes were not statistically significant, regardless of trastuzumab therapy. In a follow-up study, Green et al (2014) showed that HER2/HER3 heterodimers were significantly associated with shorter BCSS among unselected estrogen receptor-positive patients, but not among estrogen receptor-negative patients.^20, Among the subset of HER2-positive patients, there was no association between HER2/HER3 heterodimers and BCSS in estrogen receptor-positive or -negative patients who had or had not received trastuzumab.

Montemuro et al (2014) measured H2T in patients with HER2-amplified metastatic breast cancer. Of the original cohort (n=19),^14, H2T was measured in 16 patients. HER2 status was determined by testing with IHC and FISH; cut points for defining levels of H2T were not prespecified. Focusing on the analysis of H2T, authors noted that increasing log (H2T) was correlated with a corresponding increase in persistence in protocol (HR=0.73 per 2-fold increase; p=0.046). The study was limited by the small sample size. Subgroup analysis in patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Yardley et al (2015) in their retrospective multicenter study examined the correlation of results obtained by various HER2 methods with OS of breast cancer patients.^15, Testing for HER2 status was completed both at individual institutions (IHC, FISH) and centrally (IHC); patients with positive, negative, and equivocal HER2 status were included. Of the original cohort (n=232), H2T was reported for 194 patients. The authors used a predefined, published HERmark clinical cut off (13.8 RF/mm²) to define H2T levels as H2T low and H2T high in OS analysis.^6, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed in cases that had HER2 testing results and available survival data (177 cases with local IHC, 188 cases with central IHC, 65 cases with local FISH, 190 cases with local HER2 status, 190 cases with HERmark). OS analysis revealed a significant correlation between shorter OS and HER2 positivity by local IHC (HR=2.6, p=0.016), central IHC (HR=3.2, p=0.015), and HERmark (HR=5.1, p<0.001) in this cohort of patients. The OS curve of discordant low (HER2 positive but H2T low, 10% of all cases) were aligned with concordant negative (HER2 negative and H2T low, HR=1.9, p=0.444), but showed a significantly longer OS than concordant positive (HER2 positive and H2T high, HR=0.31, p=0.024). Conversely, the OS curve of discordant high (HER2 negative but H2T high, 9% of all cases) were aligned with concordant positive (HR=0.41, p=0.105), but showed a significantly shorter OS than concordant negative (HR=41, p<0.001). Most patients with HER2 positive tumors (78%) were not given HER2-targeted therapy, limiting conclusions relating to treatment response in patients with discordant test results; further limitations include the small population of the study.

Scaltriti et al (2015) examined H2T in patients with HER2 overexpressing and/or amplified invasive breast cancer.^16, Drawing from the cohort (n=455) identified in the NeoALTTO phase III study, H2T was reported for 324 patients. Cut points for defining levels of H2T were prespecified. Focusing on the analysis of H2T, an improved pathologic complete response is associated with high H2T. Use of Cox models to predict progression-free survival demonstrated that log₂ (H2T) correlated with longer progression-free survival (HR: 0.66, p=0.01). Further modeling suggests that patients with high H2T benefited most from combination treatment with lapatinib and transtuzumab, compared to transtuzumab alone. Subgroup analysis in patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Duchnowska et al (2017) examined H2T in patients with HER2 positive advanced breast cancer who demonstrated a progression on trastuzumab; these patients were subsequently treated with lapatinib plus capecitabine.^17, Testing for HER2 status was not described. Of the 189 patients in the original cohort, H2T was successfully measured for 182 patients. Cut points for defining levels of H2T were not uniformly prespecified. For patients with overexpression of H2T, OS was inversely correlated with H2T (HR: 1.9; p=0.009); the authors state that a U-shaped parabolic function could describe the relationship between H2T and OS (p=0.004). Population selection and duration of follow-up were not reported. Subgroup analysis in patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Chumsri et al (2017) examined H2T in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Of the 91 patients in the original cohort, consisting of patients from three separate trials, H2T was reported for all patients.^18, Cut points for defining levels of H2T were prespecified. While prior testing had established that all patients in this population were HER2-positive by IHC or ISH testing, 10% of patients had equivocal H2T results and 18% had negative H2T results. This was attributed in several cases to the use of different tissue samples for H2T testing compared to IHC/ISH testing, and to tumor heterogeneity. Increasing H2T was correlated with longer OS of patients (HR: 0.33; p=0.002). Subgroup analysis in patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 tests by IHC or ISH was not performed.

Section Summary: Clinically Valid

Retrospective studies have reported an association between H2T levels and survival outcomes. However, these studies are limited by variability in cut off points used to define patient groups. Analysis of H2T testing in patients with equivocal or discordant HER2 test results by IHC or ISH was performed in one retrospective study; however, the majority of patients did not receive HER2-specific therapy, limiting findings. Further studies are needed to assess the ability of the test to reclassify patients.

Clinically Useful

A test is clinically useful if the use of the results informs management decisions that improve the net health outcome of care. The net health outcome can be improved if patients receive correct therapy, or more effective therapy, or avoid unnecessary therapy, or avoid unnecessary testing.

Direct Evidence

Direct evidence of clinical utility is provided by studies that have compared health outcomes for patients managed with and without the test. Because these are intervention studies, the preferred evidence would be from randomized controlled trials. Data on the clinical utility of HERmark are lacking.

Chain of Evidence

Indirect evidence on clinical utility rests on clinical validity. If the evidence is insufficient to demonstrate test performance, no inferences can be made about clinical utility.

Summary of Evidence

For individuals who have breast cancer and are undergoing assessment of HER2 status who receive quantitative total HER2 protein expression and HER2 homodimer measurement, the evidence includes validation studies and retrospective analysis of the association between levels and survival outcomes. The relevant outcomes are overall survival, disease-specific survival, test accuracy, and test validity. Retrospective analysis using HERmark has shown that the assay may predict a worse response to trastuzumab in certain populations. However, findings have been inconsistent, and no clear association with clinical outcomes has been shown. Additionally, cut points for defining patient groups varied across studies. The clinical utility of the HERmark assay has not been demonstrated. The evidence is insufficient to determine the effects of the technology on health outcomes.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Practice Guidelines and Position Statements

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines on the treatment of breast cancer (v.3.2019) do not address the use of HERmark.^21,

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

Not applicable.

Ongoing and Unpublished Clinical Trials

A search of ClinicalTrials.gov in November 2019 did not identify any ongoing or unpublished trials that would likely influence this review.]
________________________________________________________________________________________

Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy Development Process:

This Horizon BCBSNJ Medical Policy (the “Medical Policy”) has been developed by Horizon BCBSNJ’s Medical Policy Committee (the “Committee”) consistent with generally accepted standards of medical practice, and reflects Horizon BCBSNJ’s view of the subject health care services, supplies or procedures, and in what circumstances they are deemed to be medically necessary or experimental/ investigational in nature. This Medical Policy also considers whether and to what degree the subject health care services, supplies or procedures are clinically appropriate, in terms of type, frequency, extent, site and duration and if they are considered effective for the illnesses, injuries or diseases discussed. Where relevant, this Medical Policy considers whether the subject health care services, supplies or procedures are being requested primarily for the convenience of the covered person or the health care provider. It may also consider whether the services, supplies or procedures are more costly than an alternative service or sequence of services, supplies or procedures that are at least as likely to produce equivalent therapeutic or diagnostic results as to the diagnosis or treatment of the relevant illness, injury or disease. In reaching its conclusion regarding what it considers to be the generally accepted standards of medical practice, the Committee reviews and considers the following: all credible scientific evidence published in peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, physician and health care provider specialty society recommendations, the views of physicians and health care providers practicing in relevant clinical areas (including, but not limited to, the prevailing opinion within the appropriate specialty) and any other relevant factor as determined by applicable State and Federal laws and regulations.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Index:
Quantitative Assay for Measurement of HER2 Total Protein Expression and HER2 Dimers
HERmark Breast Cancer Assay
HER2 Dimers

References:
1. Arteaga CL, O'Neill A, Moulder SL, et al. A phase I-II study of combined blockade of the ErbB receptor network with trastuzumab and gefitinib in patients with HER2 (ErbB2)-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. Oct 01 2008;14(19):6277-6283. PMID 18829509

2. de Alava E, Ocana A, Abad M, et al. Neuregulin expression modulates clinical response to trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. Jul 01 2007;25(19):2656-2663. PMID 17602072

3. Piccart M, Lohrisch C, Di Leo A, et al. The predictive value of HER2 in breast cancer. Oncology. 2001;61 Suppl 2:73-82. PMID 11694791

4. Shi Y, Huang W, Tan Y, et al. A novel proximity assay for the detection of proteins and protein complexes: quantitation of HER1 and HER2 total protein expression and homodimerization in formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded cell lines and breast cancer tissue. Diagn Mol Pathol. Mar 2009;18(1):11-21. PMID 19214113

5. Monogram Biosciences. HERmark Breast Cancer Assay. https://www.monogrambio.com/oncology-tests. Accessed November 8, 2019.

6. Lipton A, Kostler WJ, Leitzel K, et al. Quantitative HER2 protein levels predict outcome in fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab. Cancer. Nov 15 2010;116(22):5168-5178. PMID 20661914

7. Toi M, Sperinde J, Huang W, et al. Differential survival following trastuzumab treatment based on quantitative HER2 expression and HER2 homodimers in a clinic-based cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer. Feb 23 2010;10:56. PMID 20178580

8. Bates M, Sperinde J, Kostler WJ, et al. Identification of a subpopulation of metastatic breast cancer patients with very high HER2 expression levels and possible resistance to trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. Sep 2011;22(9):2014- 2020. PMID 21289364

9. Joensuu H, Sperinde J, Leinonen M, et al. Very high quantitative tumor HER2 content and outcome in early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. Sep 2011;22(9):2007-2013. PMID 21285132

10. Duchnowska R, Biernat W, Szostakiewicz B, et al. Correlation between quantitative HER-2 protein expression and risk for brain metastases in HER-2+ advanced breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab-containing therapy. Oncologist. Jan 2012;17(1):26-35. PMID 22234627

11. Han SW, Cha Y, Paquet A, et al. Correlation of HER2, p95HER2 and HER3 expression and treatment outcome of lapatinib plus capecitabine in her2-positive metastatic breast cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39943. PMID 22848366

12. Lipton A, Goodman L, Leitzel K, et al. HER3, p95HER2, and HER2 protein expression levels define multiple subtypes of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Aug 2013;141(1):43-53. PMID 23959396

13. Barros FF, Abdel-Fatah TM, Moseley P, et al. Characterisation of HER heterodimers in breast cancer using in situ proximity ligation assay. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Apr 2014;144(2):273-285. PMID 24557338

14. Montemurro F, Prat A, Rossi V et al. Potential biomarkers of long-term benefit from single-agent trastuzumab or lapatinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.. Mol Oncol, 2013 Oct 1;8(1). PMID 24075779

15. Yardley DA, Kaufman PA, Huang W, et al. Quantitative measurement of HER2 expression in breast cancers: comparison with 'real-world' routine HER2 testing in a multicenter Collaborative Biomarker Study and correlation with overall survival. Breast Cancer Res. Mar 18 2015;17:41. PMID 25886996

16. Scaltriti M, Nuciforo P, Bradbury I et al. High HER2 expression correlates with response to the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab.. Clin. Cancer Res., 2014 Dec 4;21(3). PMID 25467182

17. Duchnowska R, Sperinde J, Czartoryska-Arukowicz B et al. Predictive value of quantitative HER2, HER3 and p95HER2 levels in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients treated with lapatinib following progression on trastuzumab.. Oncotarget, 2017 Dec 22;8(61). PMID 29262628

18. Chumsri S, Sperinde J, Liu H et al. High p95HER2/HER2 Ratio Associated With Poor Outcome in Trastuzumab-Treated HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer NCCTG N0337 and NCCTG 98-32-52 (Alliance).. Clin. Cancer Res., 2018 Mar 14;24(13). PMID 29530935

19. Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome- based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. Nov 1 2004;10(21):7252-7259. PMID 15534099

20. Green AR, Barros FF, Abdel-Fatah TM, et al. HER2/HER3 heterodimers and p21 expression are capable of predicting adjuvant trastuzumab response in HER2+ breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. May 2014;145(1):33-44. PMID 24706169

21. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Breast cancer. Version 3.2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2019.

22. Palmetto GBA. MolDX: HERmark Assay by Monogram Coding and Billing Guidelines (M00028, V10). 2017; https://cgsmedicare.com/partb/pubs/news/2015/1015/cope30560b.html. Accessed November 8, 2019.

Codes:
(The list of codes is not intended to be all-inclusive and is included below for informational purposes only. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis, drug or device code(s) does not constitute or imply authorization, certification, approval, offer of coverage or guarantee of payment.)

CPT*

84999